ISOIEC20000LI Valid Exam Test | ISOIEC20000LI Reliable Exam Question
ISOIEC20000LI Valid Exam Test | ISOIEC20000LI Reliable Exam Question
Blog Article
Tags: ISOIEC20000LI Valid Exam Test, ISOIEC20000LI Reliable Exam Question, Customizable ISOIEC20000LI Exam Mode, Instant ISOIEC20000LI Access, Valid ISOIEC20000LI Test Pattern
Our ISOIEC20000LI exam questions are of high quality and efficient. We provide the client with the latest materials so that the client can follow the newest trends in theory and practice it so thus the client can pass the exam easily. Don’t be hesitated and take action immediately! The study materials what we provide is to boost pass rate and hit rate, you only need little time to prepare and review, and then you can pass the ISOIEC20000LI Exam. It costs you little time and energy, and you can download the software freely and try out the product before you buy it.
Our ISOIEC20000LI study materials have included all significant knowledge about the exam. So you do not need to pick out the important points by yourself. Also, our ISOIEC20000LI practice engine can greatly shorten your preparation time of the exam. So you just need our ISOIEC20000LI learning questions to help you get the certificate. You will find that the coming exam is just a piece of cake in front of you and you will pass it with ease.
>> ISOIEC20000LI Valid Exam Test <<
Free PDF Quiz ISOIEC20000LI - Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam –Efficient Valid Exam Test
Our brand has marched into the international market and many overseas clients purchase our ISOIEC20000LI exam dump online. As the saying goes, Rome is not build in a day. The achievements we get hinge on the constant improvement on the quality of our ISOIEC20000LI latest study question and the belief we hold that we should provide the best service for the clients. The great efforts we devote to the ISO exam dump and the experiences we accumulate for decades are incalculable. All of these lead to our success of ISOIEC20000LI learning file and high prestige.
ISO Beingcert ISO/IEC 20000 Lead Implementer Exam Sample Questions (Q89-Q94):
NEW QUESTION # 89
An organization has established a policy that provides the personnel with the information required to effectively deploy encryption solutions in order to protect organizational confidential data. What type of policy is this?
- A. High-level general policy
- B. Topic-specific policy
- C. High-level topic-specific policy
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 90
An organization has justified the exclusion of control 5.18 Access rights of ISO/IEC 27001 in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) as follows: "An access control reader is already installed at the main entrance of the building." Which statement is correct'
- A. The justification is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18
- B. The justification for the exclusion of a control is not required to be included in the SoA
- C. The justification is not acceptable because it does not indicate that it has been selected based on the risk assessment results
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, the Statement of Applicability (SoA) is a document that identifies the controls that are applicable to the organization's ISMS and explains why they are selected or not. The SoA is based on the results of the risk assessment and risk treatment, which are the previous steps in the risk management process. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of a control should be based on the risk assessment results and the risk treatment plan, and should reflect the purpose and objective of the control.
Control 5.18 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is about access rights to information and other associated assets, which should be provisioned, reviewed, modified and removed in accordance with the organization's topic-specific policy on and rules for access control. The purpose of this control is to prevent unauthorized access to, modification of, and destruction of information assets. Therefore, the justification for the exclusion of this control should explain why the organization does not need to implement this control to protect its information assets from unauthorized access.
The justification given by the organization in the question is not acceptable, because it does not reflect the purpose of control 5.18. An access control reader at the main entrance of the building is a physical security measure, which is related to control 5.15 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, not control 5.18. Control 5.18 is about logical access rights to information systems and services, which are not addressed by the access control reader. Therefore, the organization should either provide a valid justification for the exclusion of control 5.18, or include it in the SoA and implement it according to the risk assessment and risk treatment results.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.3, control 5.18; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 5, slide 18, Module 6, slide 10.
NEW QUESTION # 91
Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on scenario 8. does SunDee comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements regarding the monitoring and measurement process?
- A. No, because even though the standard does not imply when such a process should be performed, the company must have a monitoring and measurement process in place
- B. Yes. because the standard does not Indicate when the monitoring and measurement phase should be performed
- C. Yes, because the standard requires that the monitoring and measurement phase be conducted every two years
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.1, the organization shall determine:
* what needs to be monitored and measured, including information security processes and controls, as well as information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS;
* the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, to ensure valid and reliable results;
* when the monitoring and measurement shall be performed;
* who shall monitor and measure;
* who shall analyze and evaluate the monitoring and measurement results; and
* how the results shall be communicated and used for decision making and improvement.
The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of the monitoring and measurement results.
The standard does not prescribe a specific frequency or method for monitoring and measurement, but it requires the organization to have a defined and documented process that is appropriate to its context, objectives, risks, and opportunities. The organization should also ensure that the monitoring and measurement results are analyzed and evaluated to determine the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to identify any nonconformities, gaps, or improvement opportunities.
In the scenario, SunDee did not comply with these requirements, as it did not have a monitoring and measurement process in place, and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS regularly. It also did not use valid and reliable methods, or communicate and use the results for improvement.
Therefore, SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation was a major nonconformity, as Tessa correctly identified.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 9.1; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 9: Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis and Evaluation.
NEW QUESTION # 92
Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management
[